![]() |
| How about "Coca-Cola Park" or "SunTrust Field" |
Right now Liberty Media gives GM Frank Wren about a $94 million budget to work with each year. There's no "Oh hey, we really need to keep this guy so I'm going to spend an extra $10 million". The budget is what it is. One of the big reasons for the budget constraint is the current TV deal. They are locked into 25-year local TV contracts that will prevent the franchise from getting in on Major League Baseball’s trend toward much higher fees to get broadcasting rights.
The Angels’ and Rangers’ recent TV mega-deals were the reason those teams were able to acquire big name free agents Albert Pujols and Yu Darvish. The Dodgers new Magic Johnson led ownership group is looking at a deal in the billions of dollars to broadcast their games. Without the big "cash up front" broadcasting deals that other teams are getting, the Braves are put behind the 8-ball when it comes time to try to land some of the big fish, and keep some of the ones they already have. Michael Bourn springs to mind.
What kind of money are we talking about? The estimated amount of money that teams received for their current stadium/arena-naming rights deals is just over $3.5 billion. The average cost and length of all the current naming rights deals is $54.6 million over 19 years. That works out to about $2.9 million a year. Take the Houston Texans for example. The Texans sold their stadium's naming rights to Reliant Energy for $300 million over 30 years. That's $10 million a year that the Texans will get for the next 30 years. What do you think the Braves could do with an extra $10 million a year?
And the players are right here in Atlanta to auction the naming rights off to the highest bidder. What do you think Coca-Cola, Home Depot, UPS, Delta Air Lines, Southern Company or SunTrust would pay to have their name slapped on the side of the Braves ballpark?
Ok, yes...I know some of you are saying it would be horrible to remove the homage to former owner Ted Turner. And to a certain degree, I would say that's right. But there are plenty of other ways the Braves can honor Ted Turner in the stadium without passing up the opportunity to have extra money (that he used to give the Braves) to sign and retain the top players they need. Why not "Ted's Alley" or "Turner Pavilion", or even "Ted and Hank's 755 Club".
Personally I have never been a big fan of stadiums and ballparks being named after corporations or banks. But I'm even less of a fan of watching the Braves struggling to catch the Phillies with half the amount of money to spend that Philadelphia has. So I say, let the bidding begin, and au revoir to "The Ted".

Im not a braves fan or even a Georgia fan at all but I feel every team is popular by certain things example, The Cubs are famous for not winning, so I dont believe the name of the stadium has any effect on how the braves play or the players they aquire
ReplyDeleteSo you don't see how generating a ton of extra money by selling the naming rights to the stadium (like most teams do today) would help the Braves land some better free-agents or retain players they have, such as Michael Bourn? Welp..ok.
ReplyDelete